MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Glass Health vs Isabel Healthcare

Glass bills by the month and Isabel by the year. Glass Pro is $90 per month and ad-free, so two months cost more than Isabel Standard at $149 per year. Lite is free and Starter is $20 per month, and both show sponsored content. An emergency physician who wants only a ranked differential with don't-miss flags would pay for a scribe and note writer that go unused, so Glass is the wrong fit there. A small athenahealth clinic is different. Glass Max, $200 per month, lists assisted EHR workflows for athenahealth, Epic, eClinicalWorks and Elation, plus the scribe and note drafting, while Isabel offers Cerner App Gallery availability, Epic info-button access and an API. Isabel's info-button access is a thinner link for that clinic. On paperwork, Glass advertises HIPAA-compliant infrastructure and BAAs for providers and organizations, while Isabel's pages are silent on HIPAA, SOC 2 and BAA. Accuracy data is thin on both sides. GLASS AI named the right diagnosis in 1 of 4 NEJM cases in a 2024 paper, and Isabel's top ten matched a case conference in 28% of 100 rare-disease patients in 2025.

Decision support · Reviewed November 1, 2026

Glass Health logo

Glass Health

by Glass Health · founded 2021

DDx plus literature-grounded A&P plus ambient scribe in one workflow.

Isabel Healthcare logo

Isabel Healthcare

by Isabel Healthcare · founded 1999

Differential-diagnosis generator with self-triage and educator products. The vendor says it is used in over 90 countries and 14 languages.

When to pick each one

Glass Health

  • Max plan lists Epic, athenahealth, eCW and Elation workflows
  • Scribe, cited differential and note drafting in one product
  • Pro is $90 per month and ad-free
Read the full Glass Health review

Isabel Healthcare

  • Standard is $149 per year
  • Red-flag list and a medication-cause check
  • API since 2010 and a Cerner App Gallery listing
Read the full Isabel Healthcare review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Glass Health

42of 100

Competitive

Isabel Healthcare

35of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Glass Health and Isabel Healthcare
DimensionGlass HealthIsabel HealthcareDifference
FDA clearance0 / 120 / 120
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA6 / 100 / 10+6
EHR integrations (count)2.8 / 5.60 / 5.6+2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)3.4 / 4.80 / 4.8+3.4
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 2114.7 / 21-6.3
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 126 / 12+2.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 2.52.5 / 2.50
Years in market4.2 / 66 / 6-1.8

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Glass Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Liten/an/aLimited scribing and clinical decision support. Carries ad sponsorships.
Starter$20n/aCarries ad sponsorships.
Pro$90n/aMost popular tier, ad-free.
Max$200n/aFor clinics. EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is available only on this tier.

Isabel Healthcare

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Standardn/a$149EUR 139 incl. VAT. 30-day free trial.
Premiumn/a$199EUR 179 incl. VAT. Adds an LLM layer (English only).
Student / residentn/a$49Not available to EU students. 50% discount for listed emerging economies.
Institutionaln/an/aDemo request, no public price. The API has been available since 2010.

Evidence

Glass Health

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of October 26, 2026.

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Glass Health.

Community

1 post sourced: 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecGlass HealthIsabel Healthcare
Free tierYesYes
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsEpic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, ElationNot specified
Founded20211999
HQUSUK

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.