MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Glass Health vs KATE

KATE from Mednition goes to a hospital emergency department. It recommends triage acuity and flags sepsis risk from EHR data at triage, and the launch release describes it as decision support for emergency nurses. Mednition lists no public price, only an ROI calculator.

The triage gains of 26.9% overall and 93.2% for high-acuity patients are vendor figures from a 2019 study at Adventist Health White Memorial. KATE Sepsis received a Breakthrough Device Designation in November 2023. That designation is not an FDA clearance or approval, and openFDA returns no match for Mednition or KATE.

Glass Health is a different purchase, a note and differential tool for a clinician or small clinic. It is free on Lite and costs $20, $90 and $200 per month in USD on Starter, Pro and Max, with ad sponsorships on Lite and Starter.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Glass Health logo

Glass Health

by Glass Health · founded 2021

DDx plus literature-grounded A&P plus ambient scribe in one workflow.

KATE logo

KATE

by Mednition · founded 2014

KATE AI recommends emergency department triage acuity and flags sepsis risk from EHR data at triage.

When to pick each one

Glass Health

  • Ambient scribe plus cited differential diagnosis
  • Lite tier at $0, ad-sponsored
Read the full Glass Health review

KATE

  • ED triage acuity recommendation and sepsis risk flag
  • Breakthrough Device Designation for KATE Sepsis, November 2023
Read the full KATE review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Glass Health

42of 100

Competitive

KATE

12of 100

Tracked
Score by dimension for Glass Health and KATE
DimensionGlass HealthKATEDifference
FDA clearance0 / 120 / 120
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA6 / 100 / 10+6
EHR integrations (count)2.8 / 5.60 / 5.6+2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)3.4 / 4.80 / 4.8+3.4
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 210 / 21+8.4
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 123 / 12+5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 2.51.3 / 2.5+1.3
Years in market4.2 / 66 / 6-1.8

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Glass Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Liten/an/aLimited scribing and clinical decision support. Carries ad sponsorships.
Starter$20n/aCarries ad sponsorships.
Pro$90n/aMost popular tier, ad-free.
Max$200n/aFor clinics. EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is available only on this tier.

KATE

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Glass Health

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of October 26, 2026.

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Glass Health.

Community

1 post sourced: 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative.

KATE

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecGlass HealthKATE
Free tierYesNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsEpic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, ElationNot specified
Founded20212014
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.