MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Glass Health vs SimpleSense

Glass Health puts an ambient scribe, a cited differential diagnosis and billing suggestions in one workflow. The vendor lists more than 60 document types, among them H&P, ICU progress notes and prior authorization. A 2024 four-case NEJM comparison in The Neurologist scored Glass AI 1 of 4, ChatGPT-4 0 of 4 and the diagnostic generator 4 of 4, small and non-randomized. The company is a Y Combinator W23 graduate based in San Francisco, and Crunchbase lists a $5M seed (currency not stated). An internist wanting notes and a second opinion in one place would start here.

Nanowear sells a cloth garment that captures more than 85 biomarkers from the skin, according to the vendor. OpenFDA shows four 510(k) clearances, all Substantially Equivalent, while the homepage describes the platform and garment as "FDA approved." The company is based in Brooklyn, and heart failure programs enrolling patients at home are the setting it targets. One tool documents and reasons through an encounter while the other collects sensor data away from the clinic.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Glass Health logo

Glass Health

by Glass Health · founded 2021

DDx plus literature-grounded A&P plus ambient scribe in one workflow.

SimpleSense logo

SimpleSense

by Nanowear · founded 2014

Cloth wearable with 510(k) cleared AI cloud analytics for remote cardiac monitoring and cuffless blood pressure.

When to pick each one

Glass Health

  • Ambient scribe and cited differential in one tool
  • 60+ document types including H&P
  • Billing suggestions for E/M, ICD-10, CPT
Read the full Glass Health review

SimpleSense

  • Four 510(k) clearances on openFDA
  • Vendor says 85+ biomarkers from the skin
  • Brooklyn company founded 2014
Read the full SimpleSense review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Glass Health

42of 100

Competitive

SimpleSense

49of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Glass Health and SimpleSense
DimensionGlass HealthSimpleSenseDifference
FDA clearance0 / 1212 / 12-12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA6 / 100 / 10+6
EHR integrations (count)2.8 / 5.60 / 5.6+2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)3.4 / 4.80 / 4.8+3.4
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 2114.7 / 21-6.3
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 94.5 / 9-4.5
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 123 / 12+5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 2.51.3 / 2.5+1.3
Years in market4.2 / 66 / 6-1.8

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Glass Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Liten/an/aLimited scribing and clinical decision support. Carries ad sponsorships.
Starter$20n/aCarries ad sponsorships.
Pro$90n/aMost popular tier, ad-free.
Max$200n/aFor clinics. EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is available only on this tier.

SimpleSense

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Glass Health

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of October 26, 2026.

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Glass Health.

Community

1 post sourced: 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecGlass HealthSimpleSense
Free tierYesNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsEpic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, ElationNot specified
Founded20212014
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.