Glass Health vs Navina
A primary care group weighing the two is choosing between coding jobs. Glass Health states E/M, ICD-10 and CPT suggestions with MDM justification. Navina lists HCC recommendations at the point of care and care-gap closure, and its customer logos include Privia Health and Agilon Health. For a group paid on risk adjustment, Glass is the weaker pick.
Navina names athenahealth, Epic and Veradigm on its homepage and reports #1 in the 2025 Best in KLAS Clinician Digital Workflow category. Unrated KLAS excerpts say integrating several EHRs is hard, and one director says support overpromises and underdelivers. Pricing is quote-only, with KLAS comments describing a per-member-per-month fee.
Glass fits a group that wants a scribe and a differential for its clinicians. Its $200 per month Max tier adds assisted EHR workflows for Epic, eClinicalWorks, athenahealth and Elation, in the vendor's wording.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026
Glass Health
by Glass Health · founded 2021
DDx plus literature-grounded A&P plus ambient scribe in one workflow.
Navina
by Navina · founded 2018
AI copilot for chart review, risk adjustment and care gaps in primary care and value-based care groups.
When to pick each one
Glass Health
- Max tier adds assisted EHR workflows, $200 per month
- Lists E/M, ICD-10 and CPT coding with MDM justification
Navina
- athenahealth, Epic and Veradigm named on homepage
- HCC recommendations at the point of care
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Glass Health
42of 100
Navina
36of 100
| Dimension | Glass Health | Navina | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 6 / 10 | 10 / 10 | -4 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 2.8 / 5.6 | 1.7 / 5.6 | +1.1 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 3.4 / 4.8 | 3.4 / 4.8 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 8.4 / 21 | 0 / 21 | +8.4 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 8.4 / 12 | 8.4 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | +1.3 |
| Years in market | 4.2 / 6 | 6 / 6 | -1.8 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Glass Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lite | n/a | n/a | Limited scribing and clinical decision support. Carries ad sponsorships. |
| Starter | $20 | n/a | Carries ad sponsorships. |
| Pro | $90 | n/a | Most popular tier, ad-free. |
| Max | $200 | n/a | For clinics. EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is available only on this tier. |
Navina
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Glass Health
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of October 26, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names Glass Health.
Community
1 post sourced: 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative.
Navina
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Glass Health | Navina |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Elation | athenahealth, Epic, Veradigm |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
| HQ | US | n/a |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.