Glass Health vs Octagos
Octagos is a service for a cardiology group that runs a device clinic. The vendor says Atlas AI filters and prioritizes cardiac implantable device transmissions, an IBHRE-certified specialist reviews each report, and a physician e-signature completes it. The homepage states SOC 2 Type 2 and SOC 3. A physician choosing a note tool has no implantable device transmissions to triage, which leaves Glass out of a device clinic's evaluation.
Octagos names Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent and NextGen. Its Pro, Premium, Flex and Custom tiers list no amounts. The AI overview page says nothing about whether Atlas AI is FDA-cleared, exempt or classed as decision support, and three openFDA queries on the Octagos name return no 510(k) record.
Glass Health is for an individual physician who wants an ambient scribe, cited differentials and treatment plans that the vendor says draw on guidelines, literature and FDA prescribing information.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026
Glass Health
by Glass Health · founded 2021
DDx plus literature-grounded A&P plus ambient scribe in one workflow.
Octagos
by Octagos
Remote cardiac device monitoring where AI triages implantable device transmissions and US specialists review them, for cardiology clinics.
When to pick each one
Glass Health
- Treatment plans grounded in guidelines and FDA labels, per vendor
- 60+ document types, vendor claim
Octagos
- SOC 2 Type 2 and SOC 3 stated
- Specialist review of Atlas AI reports, per vendor
- Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent and NextGen
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Glass Health
42of 100
Octagos
43of 100
| Dimension | Glass Health | Octagos | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 6 / 10 | 10 / 10 | -4 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 2.8 / 5.6 | 2.8 / 5.6 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 3.4 / 4.8 | 4.8 / 4.8 | -1.4 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 8.4 / 21 | 14.7 / 21 | -6.3 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 8.4 / 12 | 3 / 12 | +5.4 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | +1.3 |
| Years in market | 4.2 / 6 | 0 / 6 | +4.2 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Glass Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lite | n/a | n/a | Limited scribing and clinical decision support. Carries ad sponsorships. |
| Starter | $20 | n/a | Carries ad sponsorships. |
| Pro | $90 | n/a | Most popular tier, ad-free. |
| Max | $200 | n/a | For clinics. EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is available only on this tier. |
Octagos
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Glass Health
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of October 26, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names Glass Health.
Community
1 post sourced: 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative.
Octagos
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
2 PubMed records name Octagos.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Glass Health | Octagos |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Elation | Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent, NextGen |
| Founded | 2021 | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.