Murphi.ai vs Nabla
Nabla raised a $70M Series C in June 2025, taking total funding to $120M. It sells a clinical AI layer to health systems with ambient documentation, E/M and ICD-10 coding suggestions, and dictation the vendor says is built into Epic, and it shows SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 badges. The vendor says it is deployed in 130+ organizations. Murphi.ai, from Deskfactors, sells to home health and hospice agencies. Its ambient module scores 112 OASIS-E items with the patient's own words as evidence and drafts HOPE and visit notes for sign-off, and it names WellSky, Axxess, HCHB, MatrixCare, KanTime and Netsmart. The vendor claims about 200 agencies. The two seldom meet in one evaluation. Nabla's customer is the health system that wants dictation and ambient notes from one vendor, and Murphi's is the agency that owes OASIS assessments on HCHB.
AI medical scribes · Reviewed November 2, 2026
When to pick each one
Murphi.ai
- Scores 112 OASIS-E items, drafts HOPE notes
- Lists WellSky, Axxess, HCHB and KanTime
- About 200 agencies, vendor says
Nabla
- Ambient documentation for health systems
- E/M and ICD-10 coding suggestions
- SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 listed
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Murphi.ai
34of 100
Nabla
36of 100
| Dimension | Murphi.ai | Nabla | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 13 / 13 | 13 / 13 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 10.5 / 21 | 0 / 21 | +10.5 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 5.2 | 0 / 5.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 8.4 / 12 | -5.4 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 6 / 6 | -6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Murphi.ai
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. The FAQ says pricing depends on agency size and modules, and a demo gets a tailored proposal. |
Nabla
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price: nabla.com/pricing returns a 404 page with a contact form. Terms of Sale state a monthly fee per authorized user, in euros excluding VAT. |
Verified October 14, 2026 from nabla.com (opens in new tab).
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Murphi.ai | Nabla |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | WellSky, Axxess, HCHB, MatrixCare, KanTime, Netsmart | Not specified |
| Founded | n/a | 2018 |
| HQ | US | FR |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Open the full ai medical scribes comparison
The best AI medical scribe for most US physicians is Abridge for hospital systems, Freed AI for solo practice (plans from $39 to $119 per month as of October 2026), Heidi Health for multilingual capture, and DAX Copilot for Microsoft-shop hospitals. Each pick below names its primary EHR integration, pricing model, and the clinician communities that surface it most often. Enterprise scribes are quote-based, with third-party estimates of roughly $208 to $600 per provider per month as of October 2026.