Navina vs Sepsis ImmunoScore
Prenosis holds FDA De Novo DEN230036 for Sepsis ImmunoScore, decided April 2, 2024. The score draws on up to 22 EHR parameters and returns four risk bands. The vendor states its intended use as adults 18 and over in the ED or hospital with suspected sepsis, not validated for ICU or Labor and Delivery. A 2024 NEJM AI development and validation study of Sepsis ImmunoScore was run by Prenosis authors. The vendor's page says it "integrates directly within the EHR" and names no EHR.
Navina serves primary care groups. A Phyx Primary Care study that Navina summarizes on its site, not peer reviewed, reports 40% less chart review time on complex visits. The vendor shows SOC 2 and ISO 27001 badges and cites a 2025 Best in KLAS win for Clinician Digital Workflow. In unrated KLAS excerpts, a director in August 2026 said its support overpromises and underdelivers, and an undated excerpt reads "Our risk adjustment factor score has improved."
An ED medical director would look at Prenosis and a primary care quality lead at Navina, since one scores sepsis risk in adults with suspected sepsis in the ED or hospital and the other supports chart review in primary care.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Navina
by Navina · founded 2018
AI copilot for chart review, risk adjustment and care gaps in primary care and value-based care groups.

Sepsis ImmunoScore
by Prenosis
AI sepsis risk score from up to 22 EHR parameters for adults with suspected sepsis in the ED or hospital, FDA De Novo authorized.
When to pick each one
Navina
- Best in KLAS 2025 per its homepage
- SOC 2 and ISO 27001 vendor badges
Sepsis ImmunoScore
- FDA De Novo DEN230036, decided April 2, 2024
- Up to 22 EHR parameters, four risk bands
- Adults with suspected sepsis in the ED or hospital
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Navina
36of 100
Sepsis ImmunoScore
37of 100
| Dimension | Navina | Sepsis ImmunoScore | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 0 / 12 | 12 / 12 | -12 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 10 / 10 | 0 / 10 | +10 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 1.7 / 5.6 | 0 / 5.6 | +1.7 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 3.4 / 4.8 | 0 / 4.8 | +3.4 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 21 | 14.7 / 21 | -14.7 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 8.4 / 12 | 3 / 12 | +5.4 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 6 / 6 | 0 / 6 | +6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Navina
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Sepsis ImmunoScore
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Demo or contact only. |
Evidence
Navina
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Sepsis ImmunoScore
FDA decisions
DEN230036 (opens in new tab)De Novo2024-04-02
Sepsis ImmunoScore
Peer-reviewed
2 PubMed records name Sepsis ImmunoScore.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Navina | Sepsis ImmunoScore |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | athenahealth, Epic, Veradigm | Not specified |
| Founded | 2018 | n/a |
| HQ | n/a | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
