Navina vs Regard

HCC capture is the shared ground. Navina sells Risk Adjustment and Regard sells HCC Capture, so a value-based group or a health system could buy either. Navina names athenahealth, Epic and Veradigm, and its listed customers are value-based groups such as Privia Health and Agilon Health. KLAS commenters describe a per-member-per-month fee, and one Director wrote that its support overpromises and underdelivers.

Regard shows health systems such as Banner Health and WakeMed on its homepage, an Epic FHIR R4 demo, a technology page saying it works regardless of EHR, and a mid-revenue-cycle solution for missed diagnoses before denials. The vendor reports $9.3 million (currency not stated) in denials prevented at a North Carolina system.

An Epic health system that wants HCC capture should treat Navina as the weaker pick, since Navina's named customers are value-based groups such as Privia Health, Agilon Health, Millennium and Summit Health, and Regard's are health systems. A primary care group on athenahealth is the reverse case, where Navina's named integration decides it.