Octagos vs Regard

Cardiology clinics with implanted device patients are the Octagos buyers. Octagos describes a two-step workflow, with Atlas AI analyzing each transmission first and an IBHRE-certified specialist finalizing, and a physician e-signature required on every report. Hospital clinical documentation and finance staff are the Regard buyers, wanting chart-wide diagnosis recommendations, each with an evidence chain according to the vendor.

Octagos reports 1 billion+ transmission pages processed and a 21-day average to EHR go-live. Regard reports 12,993,284 recommended diagnoses accepted by clinicians and shows Banner Health, Eisenhower Health and WakeMed on its homepage. All of these are vendor figures.

The openFDA 510(k) file holds nothing under Octagos, Octagos Health or Regard as applicant. Regard states audit logging on every assessment and data fetch, and Octagos states SOC 2 Type 2 and SOC 3 on Microsoft Azure. A hospital that runs both a device clinic and a documentation program would sign two contracts with two owners.