PaceMate vs Regard
The customers on Regard's homepage are health systems, among them Banner Health, WakeMed and Kettering Health. The platform reads the whole chart, recommends diagnoses with an evidence chain and drafts the note, and its technology page says no diagnostic logic reaches patients without physician approval. Because it also covers HCC capture and denial prevention, the revenue-cycle office joins the clinical buyers. Its ONC 2015 Cures Update certification dates from May 2024. Results such as Sentara's 17% rise in CC/MCC capture are the vendor's own case studies.
PaceMate serves cardiology device clinics. The vendor says Auto-Script writes a preliminary report for remote monitoring codes CPT 93294 to 93298 and saves 70% of documentation time. The security page states ISO/IEC 27001:2022, HITRUST r2, SOC 2 Type 2 and SOC 3, with hosting on AWS.
Regard's pages speak to health systems and their diagnosis, note and coding work. PaceMate's speak to the remote alert queue of a cardiac device clinic.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026
When to pick each one
PaceMate
- ISO 27001, HITRUST r2 and SOC 2 Type 2
- Vendor says Auto-Script drafts CPT 93294 to 93298 reports
Regard
- ONC Cures Update certified, May 2024
- Reads the whole chart to recommend diagnoses
- Covers HCC capture and denial prevention
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
PaceMate
47of 100
Regard
9of 100
| Dimension | PaceMate | Regard | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 10 / 10 | 0 / 10 | +10 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 1.7 / 5.6 | 1.7 / 5.6 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 4.8 / 4.8 | 1.9 / 4.8 | +2.9 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 14.7 / 21 | 0 / 21 | +14.7 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 4.5 / 9 | 0 / 9 | +4.5 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
PaceMate
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Regard
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
PaceMate
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
3 PubMed records name PaceMate.
Regard
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | PaceMate | Regard |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth | Epic |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | n/a | n/a |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.


