MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

TORTUS vs voize

voize rests on a pre-post time-motion study in German long-term care. It covered 52 nurses in 14 facilities over 770 observed hours and found documentation time per morning shift down by an adjusted 15 minutes, about 28%, with no control group and authors from voize GmbH and Charité. The vendor also announces an ORBIS U (Dedalus) integration.

Tortus points to regulatory status and NHS deployments. It says its ambient voice product is a UKCA Class IIa medical device, Royal Devon runs it with Epic, and the vendor reports Epic and Cerner ambient integrations. An NHS England evaluation across nine clinical sites and 17,000+ patients was co-run with Tortus. Pricing is quote only, and the public figures are expired UK G-Cloud 14 pilot fees, GBP 30,000 excl. VAT for three months of unlimited licenses and GBP 15,000 for up to 100 licenses.

A UK emergency department or ambulance hub documenting clinical calls and consultations buys Tortus, a German long-term-care operator documenting nursing shifts buys voize, and neither is shopping the other's product.

AI medical scribes · Reviewed November 2, 2026

TORTUS logo

TORTUS

by TORTUS AI · founded 2022

Ambient voice documentation for NHS clinicians: notes, letters, referrals and codes filed into the record after clinician approval.

voize logo

voize

by voize GmbH · founded 2020

Voice assistant that turns spoken entries by nurses into structured care documentation in German care software.

When to pick each one

TORTUS

  • Vendor-stated UKCA Class IIa, NHS-focused
  • London Ambulance Service phone hub and St George's ED
  • Epic at Royal Devon, per the vendor
Read the full TORTUS review

voize

  • German long-term care study, 52 nurses, vendor-involved
  • ORBIS U (Dedalus) integration announced
Read the full voize review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

TORTUS

33of 100

Competitive

voize

32of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for TORTUS and voize
DimensionTORTUSvoizeDifference
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 137.8 / 13-7.8
EHR integrations (count)6.3 / 216.3 / 210
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)8.4 / 120 / 12+8.4
Bidirectional write-back0 / 5.20 / 5.20
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 72.8 / 7-2.8
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 30 / 30
Funding & adoption signal6 / 123 / 12+3
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market4.2 / 64.2 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

TORTUS

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Quote onlyn/an/aNo public price. The pricing page returned a 404.

Verified October 14, 2026 from tortus.ai (opens in new tab).

voize

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Licensed per person cared for, not per user account. Quote or demo on request. Trial not stated

Evidence

TORTUS

No FDA decision, peer-reviewed study or community post in our record.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecTORTUSvoize
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsEpic, CernerORBIS U (Dedalus)
Founded20222020
HQUKDE

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full ai medical scribes comparison

The best AI medical scribe for most US physicians is Abridge for hospital systems, Freed AI for solo practice (plans from $39 to $119 per month as of October 2026), Heidi Health for multilingual capture, and DAX Copilot for Microsoft-shop hospitals. Each pick below names its primary EHR integration, pricing model, and the clinician communities that surface it most often. Enterprise scribes are quote-based, with third-party estimates of roughly $208 to $600 per provider per month as of October 2026.