MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Clarus vs Infermedica

Infermedica describes a call-center voice agent that collects symptoms, assesses acuity and prepares a structured handoff, alongside triage and intake for digital front doors and nurse lines. It is a Wroclaw company founded in 2012, and it quotes enterprise pricing. Clarus's inbound page lists scheduling against real-time availability, refills, records requests, payments and results, and its outbound page adds reminders and overdue-visit campaigns. Infermedica's buyer is a health system that needs an acuity engine behind its nurse line or front door. Clarus's buyer is a medical practice or home health agency that needs its phone work done, and a health system's nurse line is not what its pages describe, which makes these two different purchases. On security, the pages give a buyer ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2 from Infermedica and an AICPA SOC badge on Clarus's home page.

Patient triage · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Clarus logo

Clarus

by Clarus Care, LLC · founded 2013

AI agent and call handling for medical practices and home health: scheduling, refills, records requests and on-call routing.

Infermedica logo

Infermedica

by Infermedica · founded 2012

Symptom triage, intake and a call-center voice agent for care providers, certified as a Class IIb medical device under EU MDR.

When to pick each one

Clarus

  • Scheduling, refills, records requests and payments by phone
  • Outbound reminders and overdue-visit campaigns
  • Testimonial clients include Kansas City Bone and Joint
Read the full Clarus review

Infermedica

  • Triage, intake and a call-center voice agent
  • Nurse-line and digital front door use cases
  • Deployed in 30+ countries, per vendor
Read the full Infermedica review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Clarus

43of 100

Competitive

Infermedica

45of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Clarus and Infermedica
DimensionClarusInfermedicaDifference
FDA clearance0 / 15.60 / 15.60
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA13 / 1313 / 130
EHR integrations (count)9.8 / 140 / 14+9.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)8 / 80 / 8+8
Bidirectional write-back0 / 40 / 40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 145.6 / 14-5.6
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 66 / 6-6
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 55 / 5-2.5
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Clarus

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Vendor page: "book a demo".

Infermedica

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Plann/an/aEnterprise (quote).
Symptomate (consumer symptom checker)n/an/aFree and private for anyone, per the Symptomate About page.

Evidence

Clarus

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.

Infermedica

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecClarusInfermedica
Free tierNo / unverifiedYes
HIPAAYesYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes
EHR integrationsathenaOne, eClinicalWorks, NextGen, Greenway, Veradigm, Meditech, Epic, Oracle HealthNot specified
Founded20132012
HQUSPL

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full patient triage comparison

Symptom checkers, voice agents, intake automation, post-discharge messaging. Tools that reduce front-desk load, improve access, and route patients to the right care setting.