MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Eko Health vs Glass Health

Eko pairs its stethoscopes with murmur, AFib and low ejection fraction detection, with 510(k) numbers K213794 for murmur analysis and K233409 for the low-EF tool. Its Eko+ membership is $119.99 per year, and the membership table marks EHR integration for SENSORA only, with no EHR named. Glass Health's clinician page describes an ambient scribe and 60+ document types. A clinic after stethoscope-side detection and a clinic after drafted notes are shopping for different jobs.

Eko's CORE 300 page says HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II compliant. Glass's practices page says HIPAA-compliant infrastructure and BAAs for providers and organizations, and states no SOC 2 or HITRUST. For a clinic whose security reviewer asks each vendor for a SOC 2 statement, Eko's page answers and Glass's does not, so that review favors Eko.

A 2024 report in The Neurologist ran four NEJM cases through several tools. Glass got 1 of 4, ChatGPT-4 got 0 of 4 and a diagnostic generator got 4 of 4, in a small non-randomized comparison.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Eko Health logo

Eko Health

by Eko Health

Digital stethoscopes and an AI membership that detect heart murmurs, AFib and low ejection fraction for clinicians.

Glass Health logo

Glass Health

by Glass Health · founded 2021

DDx plus literature-grounded A&P plus ambient scribe in one workflow.

When to pick each one

Eko Health

  • Murmur and low-EF software with K213794 and K233409
  • Vendor states SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA
  • Eko+ AI membership at $119.99 per year
Read the full Eko Health review

Glass Health

  • Ambient scribe and differentials with citations
  • Vendor offers BAAs for providers and organizations
  • Vendor cites 150,000+ FDA drug labels in its knowledge base
Read the full Glass Health review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Eko Health

48of 100

Solid choice

Glass Health

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Eko Health and Glass Health
DimensionEko HealthGlass HealthDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 106 / 10+4
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.62.8 / 5.6-2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.83.4 / 4.8-3.4
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 218.4 / 210
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.52.5 / 2.5-1.2
Years in market0 / 64.2 / 6-4.2

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Eko Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
CORE 300 digital stethoscopen/an/aSale price, list price $249 struck through on the product page. Sale end date not shown.
Eko+n/an/aRequired for Eko AI. Renews automatically for the year. 14-day free trial, downgrade to Free before day 14.
Enterprise (SENSORA, Eko Telehealth)n/an/aNo public price. Contact sales.

Glass Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Liten/an/aLimited scribing and clinical decision support. Carries ad sponsorships.
Starter$20n/aCarries ad sponsorships.
Pro$90n/aMost popular tier, ad-free.
Max$200n/aFor clinics. EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is available only on this tier.

Evidence

Eko Health

FDA decisions

Show 5 more

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Eko Health.

Glass Health

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of October 26, 2026.

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Glass Health.

Community

1 post sourced: 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecEko HealthGlass Health
Free tierYesYes
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedEpic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Elation
Foundedn/a2021
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.