MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Etiometry Platform vs Glass Health

No clinician or hospital is likely to weigh these two against each other. A critical care program runs Etiometry's four risk indices for inadequate oxygen delivery, CO2 ventilation, lactate and pH. The vendor's stated indications run mostly to post-surgical or ventilated children up to age 12, with adults added for the oxygen-delivery index. Etiometry quotes through a demo request.

Glass Health sells monthly plans to a clinician who wants a scribe, a cited differential and coding suggestions in one place. Lite is $0 per month with ads, Starter $20 with ads, Pro $90 ad-free, Max $200. The vendor states HIPAA-compliant infrastructure and BAAs and claims no FDA status. A four-case test in The Neurologist, small and non-randomized, had Glass right on one case, ChatGPT-4 on none and a diagnostic generator on all four. The vendor-stated Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks and Elation workflows come only with Max.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Etiometry Platform logo

Etiometry Platform

by Etiometry · founded 2010

ICU data platform that aggregates monitor and EHR data and runs four FDA-cleared physiologic risk indices.

Glass Health logo

Glass Health

by Glass Health · founded 2021

DDx plus literature-grounded A&P plus ambient scribe in one workflow.

When to pick each one

Etiometry Platform

  • Four FDA-cleared ICU risk indices
  • Oxygen-delivery index covers children and adults
  • Lactate, pH and CO2 indices for post-surgical or ventilated children
Read the full Etiometry Platform review

Glass Health

  • Plans from $0 to $200 per month
  • Scribe, cited differential and coding suggestions
  • Epic, athenahealth, eCW, Elation workflows on the $200 Max tier
Read the full Glass Health review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Etiometry Platform

38of 100

Competitive

Glass Health

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Etiometry Platform and Glass Health
DimensionEtiometry PlatformGlass HealthDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 106 / 10+4
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.62.8 / 5.6-2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.83.4 / 4.8-3.4
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 218.4 / 21-8.4
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.52.5 / 2.5-1.2
Years in market6 / 64.2 / 6+1.8

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Etiometry Platform

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Glass Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Liten/an/aLimited scribing and clinical decision support. Carries ad sponsorships.
Starter$20n/aCarries ad sponsorships.
Pro$90n/aMost popular tier, ad-free.
Max$200n/aFor clinics. EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is available only on this tier.

Evidence

Etiometry Platform

FDA decisions

Show 6 more

Glass Health

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of October 26, 2026.

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Glass Health.

Community

1 post sourced: 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecEtiometry PlatformGlass Health
Free tierNo / unverifiedYes
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedEpic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Elation
Founded20102021
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.