MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Etiometry Platform vs Sepsis ImmunoScore

Etiometry's four indices cover oxygen delivery, CO2 ventilation, lactate and pH in post-surgical or ventilated patients, mostly children, which leaves an ED sepsis lead outside its indications. Prenosis was built for that lead's patient. Its Sepsis ImmunoScore holds De Novo DEN230036 from April 2024 and reads up to 22 EHR parameters, including procalcitonin, CRP and lactate, then returns one of four risk bands for deterioration within 24 hours in adults admitted to the ED or hospital with suspected sepsis. Its NEJM AI paper is a development and validation study run by the company. Per its product page, sepsis is paid through the DRG with no separate payment for the tool, and a new ICD-10-PCS code for AI sepsis tools applies from October 2025.

Prenosis states that the score has not been validated in ICU or Labor and Delivery units. An ICU director shopping for risk analytics can rule it out on that wording and look at Etiometry's adult oxygen-delivery index.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Etiometry Platform logo

Etiometry Platform

by Etiometry · founded 2010

ICU data platform that aggregates monitor and EHR data and runs four FDA-cleared physiologic risk indices.

AI sepsis risk score from up to 22 EHR parameters for adults with suspected sepsis in the ED or hospital, FDA De Novo authorized.

When to pick each one

Etiometry Platform

  • Post-surgical and ventilated ICU patients
  • Oxygen delivery, ventilation, lactate and pH indices
  • Vendor says it supports automating hospital-defined pathways
Read the full Etiometry Platform review

Sepsis ImmunoScore

  • FDA De Novo DEN230036, April 2024
  • Adults with suspected sepsis in ED or hospital
  • Up to 22 EHR parameters, four risk bands
Read the full Sepsis ImmunoScore review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Etiometry Platform

38of 100

Competitive

Sepsis ImmunoScore

37of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Etiometry Platform and Sepsis ImmunoScore
DimensionEtiometry PlatformSepsis ImmunoScoreDifference
FDA clearance12 / 1212 / 120
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.60 / 5.60
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.80 / 4.80
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 2114.7 / 21-14.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Etiometry Platform

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Sepsis ImmunoScore

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo or contact only.

Evidence

Etiometry Platform

FDA decisions

Show 6 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecEtiometry PlatformSepsis ImmunoScore
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded2010n/a
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.