Glass Health vs Regard
Regard sells to health systems, and access runs through a demo request. The vendor says it reviews the full chart, recommends diagnoses with an evidence chain and drafts notes for physician approval. The homepage names Banner Health, Main Line Health and WakeMed, and the product holds ONC Health IT certification dated May 2024. The technology page shows Epic and FHIR R4 in a demo graphic while claiming it works on any EHR.
Sentara's 17% rise in CC/MCC capture is a vendor case study, and revenue capture is part of what Regard sells. A health system running a chart-wide diagnosis and revenue program is not shopping for a clinic tier, which is what Glass's Max plan is. openFDA returns no match for Regard.
Glass Health serves individual physicians and clinics. Its $200 per month Max tier is the clinic tier, with assisted EHR workflows for Epic, eClinicalWorks, athenahealth and Elation in the vendor's wording, and the practices page states BAAs.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026
Glass Health
by Glass Health · founded 2021
DDx plus literature-grounded A&P plus ambient scribe in one workflow.
Regard
by Regard
AI platform that reviews the full EHR chart, suggests supported diagnoses with evidence, and drafts clinical notes for physician approval.
When to pick each one
Glass Health
- Max tier for clinics, assisted EHR workflows
- BAAs stated on its practices page
Regard
- ONC Health IT certification, May 2024
- Chart-wide diagnosis recommendations with evidence, per vendor
- Banner Health, Main Line Health and WakeMed named
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Glass Health
42of 100
Regard
9of 100
| Dimension | Glass Health | Regard | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 6 / 10 | 0 / 10 | +6 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 2.8 / 5.6 | 1.7 / 5.6 | +1.1 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 3.4 / 4.8 | 1.9 / 4.8 | +1.4 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 8.4 / 21 | 0 / 21 | +8.4 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 8.4 / 12 | 3 / 12 | +5.4 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | +1.3 |
| Years in market | 4.2 / 6 | 0 / 6 | +4.2 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Glass Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lite | n/a | n/a | Limited scribing and clinical decision support. Carries ad sponsorships. |
| Starter | $20 | n/a | Carries ad sponsorships. |
| Pro | $90 | n/a | Most popular tier, ad-free. |
| Max | $200 | n/a | For clinics. EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is available only on this tier. |
Regard
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Glass Health
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of October 26, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names Glass Health.
Community
1 post sourced: 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative.
Regard
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Glass Health | Regard |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Elation | Epic |
| Founded | 2021 | n/a |
| HQ | US | n/a |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.