MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Infermedica vs Keona Health

Infermedica sells triage, intake and a call-center voice agent to care providers on an enterprise quote, and a hospital group building front-door triage is its buyer, as is a developer on its Triage API. A 2026 single-center emergency-department study randomized 18,000 adults to Infermedica, the Emergency Severity Index or the Manchester Triage System. Its home page describes the voice agent as collecting symptoms, assessing acuity and preparing a structured handoff. Keona's Kara page lists scheduling with provider rules, refills, results and billing. For a US orthopedic group whose calls are mostly scheduling and refills, Infermedica is the wrong buy. Keona also sells Nurse Triage on Schmitt-Thompson content with 600+ adult and pediatric topics, and it claims independent audits showing over 95% alignment with human decisions. Golden State Ortho and Intermountain Healthcare appear in its case studies, which makes Keona the buy for a multi-office specialty group that wants a nurse queue ordered by acuity and one-click charting.

Patient triage · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Infermedica logo

Infermedica

by Infermedica · founded 2012

Symptom triage, intake and a call-center voice agent for care providers, certified as a Class IIb medical device under EU MDR.

Keona Health logo

Keona Health

by Keona Health

Kara AI call agent answers and books patient calls. Nurse Triage software supports nurses with protocol-based call routing.

When to pick each one

Infermedica

  • Triage, intake and call-center voice agent
  • 2026 randomized ED trial, 18,000 adults
  • Enterprise pricing by quote
Read the full Infermedica review

Keona Health

  • Schmitt-Thompson nurse triage, 600+ topics
  • Case studies from Golden State Ortho and Intermountain
  • Nurse queue ordered by acuity
Read the full Keona Health review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Infermedica

45of 100

Solid choice

Keona Health

32of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Infermedica and Keona Health
DimensionInfermedicaKeona HealthDifference
FDA clearance0 / 15.60 / 15.60
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA13 / 137.8 / 13+5.2
EHR integrations (count)0 / 149.8 / 14-9.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 88 / 8-8
Bidirectional write-back0 / 40 / 40
Peer-reviewed papers5.6 / 140 / 14+5.6
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review6 / 60 / 6+6
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 123 / 12+5.4
Pricing transparency5 / 52.5 / 5+2.5
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Infermedica

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Plann/an/aEnterprise (quote).
Symptomate (consumer symptom checker)n/an/aFree and private for anyone, per the Symptomate About page.

Keona Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Kara is priced on call volume rather than per-seat licenses.

Evidence

Infermedica

Keona Health

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecInfermedicaKeona Health
Free tierYesNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedEpic, Allscripts, athena Practice, athenaNext, ClinicalWorks, Greenway, Cerner, Meditech, Veradigm, Altera, ModMed
Founded2012n/a
HQPLUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full patient triage comparison

Symptom checkers, voice agents, intake automation, post-discharge messaging. Tools that reduce front-desk load, improve access, and route patients to the right care setting.