MedAI Verdict

Clinical Decision Support · 57 tools

Editorial illustration: a magnifying glass over an anatomical heart, with a branching differential-diagnosis tree leading to ischemic, valvular, and inflammatory etiologies.

PMcardio Queen of Hearts

PMcardio Queen of Hearts logo
59/ 100

Evidence & Documentation Score

This legacy score reflects documented evidence, integrations, transparency, and market signals. It does not measure overall product performance. A new product-focused rating system is in development. How it is computed

reviewed November 5, 2026

Vendor
Powerful Medical, US
Pricing
from EUR 10/mo
EHR
Not stated
Compliance
HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, FDA De Novo +3 more

Bottom line. Queen of Hearts is the acute coronary syndrome module of PMcardio, sold by Powerful Medical from New York and Bratislava. It reads an image or file of any 12-lead ECG and flags STEMI and the STEMI-equivalent occlusion patterns that standard ST-elevation criteria miss. On September 3, 2026 the FDA granted it De Novo authorization under the name "STEMI AI ECG… Read the full bottom line

Visit PMcardio Queen of Hearts (opens in new tab)

HIPAA · SOC 2 Type II · FDA De Novo · CE · ISO 27001 · GDPR · 6 papers

Performance profile

  • Regulatory and compliance22 / 22
  • Clinical integration0 / 11.6
  • Evidence strength12.9 / 30
  • Vendor and market12 / 18
  • Sentiment and transparency2.5 / 2.5

Performance profile

  • Regulatory and compliance22 / 22
  • Clinical integration0 / 11.6
  • Evidence strength12.9 / 30
  • Vendor and market12 / 18
  • Sentiment and transparency2.5 / 2.5
On this page

All 10 dimensions

Regulatory and compliance

  • FDA clearance12 / 12

    FDA authorized (1 De Novo grant on record)

  • HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 10

    HIPAA + (SOC2 or BAA) attested

Clinical integration

  • EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.6

    No EHR integrations listed

  • Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.8

    None of the top-3 EHRs covered

  • Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.2

    No bidirectional write-back documented

Evidence strength

  • Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 21

    1 peer-reviewed paper evaluating the product; 5 not counted (product only mentioned or used, or not yet classified)

  • RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review4.5 / 9

    1 observational study (no RCT)

Vendor and market

  • Funding & adoption signal6 / 12

    Early-stage company

  • Years in market6 / 6

    Founded 2017 (9 years)

Sentiment and transparency

  • Pricing transparency2.5 / 2.5

    Prices listed publicly

Computed November 12, 2026 by our public rubric. How it’s computed

PMcardio Queen of Hearts pricing in 2026: what it actually costs

From
From EUR 10 for per user per month
Price points
4
Verified
November 5, 2026
Source
powerfulmedical.com

Three public tiers on the vendor pricing page, shown for the Slovak region in EUR: a free plan with 5 ECGs a month, Individuals at 10 EUR a month for 50 ECGs, Teams at 2,610 EUR a year for 10 users and 1,000 ECGs. Organizations are priced on request. The page states that pricing varies by country, so US list prices may differ.

TierBilling periodPriceNotes
Freeper monthFree5 ECG reports per month, no credit card. The pricing page defaults to the Slovak region and says prices vary by country.
Individualsper user per monthEUR 1010 EUR per month, 17 percent off billed yearly. 50 ECGs per month, Queen of Hearts, LVsense, ECGxplain and 36 core diagnostics, mobile app only, 30-day report history. Paid through the app store. Slovak-region price; the page says prices vary by country.
Teamsper yearEUR 2,6102,610 EUR per year for 10 users (22 EUR per user per month, billed yearly), scalable to 50 users, 1,000 ECGs per month, web app, unlimited report history, US or EU data centre, onboarding session. Invoiced. Slovak-region price.
OrganizationsNot statedNot statedNo public price. Unlimited reports, users and locations, HL7/XML and EHR integration, AI-powered STEMI pathway, dedicated data residency and SLA. Contact sales.

Discounts

Verified November 5, 2026 from powerfulmedical.com (opens in new tab).

Compliance

Attested
FDA De Novo, CE, HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR
EHR integrations
Not stated
FDA
1 decision on record

Carries FDA De Novo, CE, HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR per vendor documentation. Independent attestation review is the buyer's responsibility before clinical deployment.

Vendor stability

Company
Powerful Medical
Headquarters
US
Founded
2017

PMcardio Queen of Hearts (Powerful Medical) was founded in 2017 in US, putting it 9 years into market.

Vendor sitewww.powerfulmedical.com/pmcardio-stemi/ (opens in new tab)

Evidence record

RecordWhat we found
FDA decisions
Peer-reviewed

6 studies on PubMed: 4 other, 1 case report, 1 observational, published 2023 to 2026. Read the literature summary

Verification
  • Score computed November 12, 2026, method 1.2.1
  • Pricing verified November 5, 2026
  • Review written November 5, 2026
Cite this record

MedAI Verdict, PMcardio Queen of Hearts record, https://medaiverdict.com/tools/pmcardio-queen-of-hearts, version November 5, 2026

Change historyView every change to this record

Peer-reviewed coverage

PubMed lists 5 papers that name PMcardio Queen of Hearts, shown by relevance (title match, study design, recency, journal tier). 1 of them evaluate the product itself; the others only mention it, use it as a tool or do not identify it clearly, and do not count as evidence.

YearJournalTitleAuthors
2025J ElectrocardiolElectrocardiographic diagnostic possibilities for atrial fibrillation using artificial intelligence: Differentiation from sinus rhythm and other arrhythmias with the PMcardio app in COVID-19 patients. (opens in new tab)Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential in enhancing ECG analysis, but its accuracy in detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) in COVID-19 patients remains unstudied. Given the increased risk of arrhythmias and thromboembolic events in this population, AI could aid in timely correct diagnosis, reduce unnecessary consultations, tests, and minimize infection spread. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the AI-based PMcardio application in detecting AF in COVID-19 patients. The study analyzed 116 hospitalized COVID-19 consecutive patients using paper-based medical records, with…Vainoryte R, Jucevicius J, Baubonis E, et al.
2025CureusCase ReportBifascicular Block Associated With Myocardial Infarction: A Marker of Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery Occlusion Confirmed by the Artificial Intelligence-Based Smartphone App Queen of Hearts. (opens in new tab)In a clinical context highly suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the presence of a bifascicular block (BFB) should be considered a potential ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) equivalent. A right bundle branch block (RBBB) may obscure accurate assessment of the ST segment, potentially masking ischemic changes. Therefore, in patients with suspected ACS, BFB (RBBB and left anterior fascicular block), whether new or pre-existing, should be managed as a high-risk finding and treated according to STEMI protocols if clinical suspicion is strong. We report the case of a man in his 7…Granata LG, Russo F, Giubilato S, et al.
2025Am J Emerg MedObservationalAccuracy of cath lab activation decisions for STEMI-equivalent and mimic ECGs: Physicians vs. AI (Queen of Hearts by PMcardio). (opens in new tab)Accurate ECG interpretation is crucial to identify occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) to determine the need for immediate catheterization laboratory activation (CLA). STEMI-equivalent and STEMI-mimic ECG patterns deviate from conventional STEMI criteria, risking misclassification of OMI cases. The diagnostic accuracy for these complex ECGs is unknown. This study aimed to measure physician accuracy for interpreting STEMI-equivalent and STEMI-mimic ECGs for catheterization laboratory activation (CLA) and compare their performance to a machine learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm,…Shroyer S, Mehta S, Thukral N, et al.
2026Am J Emerg MedThe authors respond to reader comment Accuracy of cath lab activation decisions for STEMI-equivalent andmimic ECGs: Physicians vs. AI (Queen of Hearts by PMcardio). (opens in new tab)Shroyer S, Mehta S, Thukral N, et al.
2026Int J Qual Health CareBringing artificial intelligence to the front lines: PMcardio for detecting occlusive myocardial infarction in STEMI and STEMI-equivalent activations. (opens in new tab)Bahrou M, Missula K, Amadi T, et al.

See all on PubMed (opens in new tab)

Bottom line

Queen of Hearts is the acute coronary syndrome module of PMcardio, sold by Powerful Medical from New York and Bratislava. It reads an image or file of any 12-lead ECG and flags STEMI and the STEMI-equivalent occlusion patterns that standard ST-elevation criteria miss. On September 3, 2026 the FDA granted it De Novo authorization under the name "STEMI AI ECG Model". The company positions it as decision support for pre-hospital EMS, emergency departments and hospitals, and in the one published reader study it scored 88.9 percent against about 65 percent for physicians on STEMI-equivalent and mimic ECGs. A clinic that wants routine ECG interpretation is looking at the wrong module, since that is PMcardio's separate Core Diagnostics product with 36 diagnoses.

FDA De Novo authorized AI ECG model that flags STEMI and STEMI-equivalent occlusion MI on any 12-lead ECG, in the PMcardio app and in health-system STEMI pathways.

Pricing from from EUR 10/mo. HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II attested.

What did the FDA authorize?

The De Novo record DEN250044 names the device "STEMI AI ECG Model", lists Powerful Medical, Inc. at 33 W 17th Street, New York, shows the request received on September 22, 2025 and granted on September 3, 2026, and notes an authorized Predetermined Change Control Plan. The company markets the same model as Queen of Hearts and calls the grant "the first FDA De Novo authorization specifically for AI-ECG detection of ACS that requires urgent cardiologist review". The FDA had given it Breakthrough Device designation in March 2025. In Europe the module is CE marked as a Class IIb device under the MDR and certified for the EU and UK. The company's LVsense module for reduced ejection fraction is investigational in the US and not for clinical use there.

The model reads one ECG at a time, so serial comparison is not supported, and the company describes it as a locked algorithm that does not retrain in use. It accepts 12-lead recordings as a single-page image or a multi-page report. One-, three- and six-lead recordings are not supported.

What does the evidence say?

The strongest published test is a 2025 comparative study in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine. Fifty-three emergency physicians and 42 cardiologists interpreted 18 ECGs, eight STEMI equivalents and eight mimics plus one STEMI and one normal ECG, to decide whether an occlusion MI needed immediate cath lab activation. Emergency physicians were right 65.6 percent of the time and cardiologists 65.5 percent. Queen of Hearts scored 88.9 percent, with a 95 percent confidence interval of 82 to 93. Physicians most often misread de Winter patterns, transient STEMI, hyperacute T waves and bundle branch block ECGs. The model misclassified a left bundle branch block with occlusion and a ventricular aneurysm without one. The authors ask for prospective validation.

A 2025 Cureus case report describes a man in his seventies with a new bifascicular block and anterior ST elevation, a proximal LAD subocclusion on angiography, and an app reading of STEMI equivalent. Two further studies test other PMcardio functions. AMSTELHEART-1 (2023) ran the photographed-ECG app on 290 Dutch primary-care patients against a blinded expert panel and found 86 percent sensitivity and 92 percent specificity for any major abnormality, with 97 and 99 percent for atrial fibrillation. A 2025 Journal of Electrocardiology study of 116 hospitalized COVID-19 patients reported sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 for atrial fibrillation against a cardiologist's read.

The company's own figures are larger. It claims twice the sensitivity and 81 percent fewer false positives than standard STEMI criteria, a 92 percent cut in false-positive cath lab activations, an AUC of 0.938 and 48 minutes of door-to-balloon time saved at AZORG, a six-hospital case study. It counts 15 or more peer-reviewed studies on the product page and more than 20 in its press release, covering more than 40,000 patients, and lists the DIFOCCULT-3 randomized trial of 6,000 patients, started in October 2024 with recruiting completed. Those are vendor claims.

What does it cost?

As of November 2026 the pricing page shows prices for the Slovak region in euros and states that pricing varies by country. US list prices are not published.

  • Free: five ECGs a month, no credit card.
  • Individuals: 10 EUR a month, 17 percent less when billed yearly, 50 ECGs a month, mobile app only, 30-day report history, paid through the app store. The FAQ gives the Pro plan 100 ECGs a month, against 50 on the pricing page.
  • Teams: 2,610 EUR a year for 10 users, or 22 EUR per user per month billed yearly, scalable to 50 users, 1,000 ECGs a month, web app, unlimited history, a US or EU data centre and an onboarding session. Each five added users take 5 percent off.
  • Organizations: custom pricing with unlimited reports, users and locations, HL7 and XML feeds, EHR integration, the STEMI pathway product, dedicated data residency and an SLA.

Fees are generally non-refundable, and there is no non-profit or educational discount.

How does it fit a hospital pathway?

The company states SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA compliance with a Business Associate Agreement, encryption in transit and at rest, single sign-on, role-based access and audit trails, with data hosted in the US or the EU and a 99.9 percent uptime SLA. PMcardio can be launched from the EHR through secure links and SSO and sends results back to clinical systems. No EHR vendor is named. The company names the ECG device makers GE HealthCare, Philips, Stryker LIFEPAK, corpuls and ZOLL, and supports the AHA Get With The Guidelines registry. It reports more than 100,000 clinicians, 2.5 million ECGs analysed and 150 hospital deployments, and shows Mayo Clinic, Duke Health and Cook County Health among its logos. On its blog the company announces a Category III CPT code, 1139T, for AI ECG heart attack detection from January 1, 2027.

The verdict

An emergency department or EMS service that makes its own cath lab activation decisions is the buyer the company describes, and the reader study, 88.9 percent against 65.5 percent for cardiologists across 18 ECGs, is the evidence it has to show so far. The pathway product with device feeds and EHR launch is where the compliance package, data residency and SLA live, while the 10 EUR app covers one clinician's phone with 50 ECGs a month. A hospital that wants routine interpretation is buying PMcardio's Core Diagnostics, a separate module with 36 diagnoses that this one does not include.

Editorial review last generated November 5, 2026. Synthesized from clinician sentiment, peer-reviewed coverage, and our editorial silo picks. Refined by hand where vendor facts change.

Link to this review

PMcardio Queen of Hearts, reviewed on MedAI Verdict

Vendors may place this badge on their own site. It links to this review with a tracking parameter and has no effect on the score.

<a href="https://medaiverdict.com/tools/pmcardio-queen-of-hearts?utm_source=vendor_badge&utm_medium=badge&utm_campaign=pmcardio-queen-of-hearts"><img src="https://medaiverdict.com/badges/reviewed-on-medaiverdict.png" srcset="https://medaiverdict.com/badges/reviewed-on-medaiverdict@2x.png 2x" alt="PMcardio Queen of Hearts, reviewed on MedAI Verdict" width="200" height="56"></a>

What we have not verified

  1. We have not run PMcardio Queen of Hearts in our own clinical practice. Pricing, certifications, and EHR-integration claims come from vendor documentation and have not been independently audited.
  2. Enterprise pricing tiers and SLA terms are typically under NDA and not publicly verifiable. Numbers shown reflect publicly disclosed self-service or list pricing only.
  3. Real-world latency, note quality, and accuracy in your specific specialty and patient population can vary materially from vendor demonstrations. We recommend a 30-day trial with two providers before commitment.

Last verified . Read our methodology · Decision support