Antidote AI

What is Antidote AI?

The homepage reads: "Beyond AI Scribes. The First Conversational Clinical Operating System. AI scribes document what you say. Antidote drives what happens next" (antidote-ai.com). It lists ambient listening that structures SOAP notes with ICD-10 and CPT codes, "Review and approve in seconds", medication recommendations, contraindication alerts, evidence-based treatment suggestions and a "next three actions" prompt.

It also lists workflow orchestration: prior authorization forms, referral letters, patient instructions, prescriptions queued for review and follow-up scheduling. A natural-language query demo is labeled "simulated". Specialty content covers cardiology (AHA/ACC guideline integration and ASCVD risk), oncology, orthopedics, dermatology and psychiatry.

Who makes it?

Not known. The company, headquarters, founding year, ownership and funding for antidote-ai.com are not published. On 14 October 2026 the /privacy, /about and /terms pages on the site returned a 404, so no official company, legal entity or privacy page exists to cite.

Companies with similar names, such as Antidote Health, are not linked to antidote-ai.com by any source, and the name is shared by several unrelated businesses.

What does the vendor claim about performance?

The homepage says "Reclaim 2-3 hours daily" and "50-60% reduction in documentation time", attributed to "data from early adopter practices and pilot programs". It cites no study, no customers and no method. The demo is simulated. The homepage also quotes general statistics (4+ hours of documentation daily, 63% burnout, 16,000+ annual clicks) without sources.

A vendor blog post ranks Antidote first among scribes, with "99.1% documentation accuracy", "92% physician satisfaction" and "2.7 hours saved daily". These are self-reported with no methodology.

For context, a narrative review of scribe studies reported an average of 23.6 errors per clinical case and 52.9% of data elements consistently correct across three versions (Clinical and Diagnostic Technology, cdt.amegroups.org). The review does not cover Antidote, but it is a reason to treat any 99% accuracy claim as unmeasured.

No peer-reviewed study or KLAS, G2 or Reddit review is listed.

What about HIPAA, SOC 2 and FDA?

The homepage states "Full HIPAA compliance with BAAs available. Regular security audits and penetration testing" and a "99.9% uptime SLA". These are vendor claims. SOC 2 Type II appears in the vendor's own blog but not in the homepage text, and no report is published. BAA terms are not published on the pages reviewed.

HITRUST is not stated. FDA status is not stated either, which matters here because treatment suggestions and contraindication alerts are the kind of function regulators may treat as clinical decision support. The vendor publishes no regulatory statement.

Which EHRs does it connect to?

None are named. The homepage says "Works with existing EHR workflows", the pricing tiers mention "basic integrations", and the product also positions itself as an EHR replacement. The homepage comparison table names Abridge, Suki and Freed among scribes and Epic and Cerner among EHRs, with comparison points chosen by the vendor.

What does it cost?

The homepage lists Solo Practice at $199 per provider per month, up to 500 encounters a month, and Group Practice (5 or more providers) at $149 per provider per month with unlimited encounters, both on annual billing as of October 2026. Monthly rates and the trial length are not stated, and the /pricing page returns a 404. A vendor blog post quotes custom enterprise pricing of $399 to $599 per physician per month, which conflicts with the homepage.

Who should consider it?

A practice in cardiology or oncology that wants to evaluate the free trial could start with test data only. The price is $149 to $199 per provider per month, a real cost for a product with no named customers.

Everyone else should pick a scribe whose operator, security report and customers can be checked.