MedAI Verdict

Clinical Decision Support

OpenEvidence review

OpenEvidence alternatives

22 tools that we compared head to head with OpenEvidence in a written verdict. 19 of them are decision support like OpenEvidence; the rest come from neighbouring categories. Each row says who the tool suits, according to that verdict, and links to the full comparison.

The list is not a ranking. Tools in the same category come first, then every group is in alphabetical order. A tool that is no longer sold is left out.

  • Avo logo

    Avo

    Own guideline pathways embedded in the EHR chart; demo-based enterprise sales

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Bayesian Health logo

    Bayesian Health

    FDA 510(k) K250680, cleared April 2026; built on the Johns Hopkins TREWS sepsis system

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Birth Model logo

    Birth Model

    Alerts for hemorrhage, preeclampsia and shoulder dystocia; demo and ROI calculator, no public price

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Ceribell logo

    Ceribell

    Order-based hospital contract, net 30, one-year initial term; dECIDE multicenter prospective study of rapid-response EEG

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • DermaSensor logo

    DermaSensor

    Handheld spectroscopy score on suspicious lesions; try-and-return option on the rental

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • eCART logo

    eCART

    Deterioration alerts cleared in June 2024; vendor-reported 13% mortality reduction at Yale

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Eko Health logo

    Eko Health

    Digital stethoscope AI for murmurs and AFib; 2019 field evaluation of the teleauscultation system

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Epic Sepsis Model logo

    Epic Sepsis Model

    Native to Epic for inpatients and ED; version 2 can be localized per hospital

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Glass Health logo

    Glass Health

    Ambient scribe plus cited differential diagnosis; pro is $90 per month and ad-free

    From $20 a month

    Full comparison
  • Isabel Healthcare logo

    Isabel Healthcare

    Ranked differential with don't-miss flags from symptoms; standard is $149 per year after a 30-day trial

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Kardia 12L logo

    Kardia 12L

    SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 stated; fDA-cleared AI interpretation of ECG tracings

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • KATE logo

    KATE

    Enterprise purchase with an ROI calculator; adventist Health White Memorial and Glendale named as customers

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • MyoVista wavECG logo

    MyoVista wavECG

    Advisory interpretive statements for adults and children; vendor site lists CE Mark and ISO 13485

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Octagos logo

    Octagos

    Atlas AI drafts, specialist finalizes, physician e-signs; triages implanted device transmissions for clinics

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • PaceMate logo

    PaceMate

    Vendor says Epic, Oracle Health and athenahealth links; auto-Triage ranks cardiac device alerts

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • SimpleSense logo

    SimpleSense

    Prospective study, 303 subjects over four weeks; four 510(k) numbers from K161431 to K232053

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • UpToDate Expert AI logo

    UpToDate Expert AI

    Expert AI included in US UpToDate subscriptions; epic content sets and in-EHR availability

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • VisualDx logo

    VisualDx

    50,000+ clinical images across skin tones; elite is $299.99 per year, billed annually

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Zio

    Zio AT adds mobile cardiac telemetry; two Zio AT 510(k)s cleared October 2024

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Consensus logo

    Consensus

    Searches 250M+ papers (vendor figure); pro at $12 per month, billed annually

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Elicit logo

    Elicit

    Pro screening workflow for 5,000 papers; pro at $49 per user monthly, billed annually

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison
  • Scite logo

    Scite

    Smart Citations across 322M+ articles (vendor figure); pro at $40 per month, billed yearly

    See the review for plans

    Full comparison

Read the OpenEvidence reviewAll decision support